I put this in the same category of manually managing charge profiles. I think the advice is to not assume that you can manually set a better cooling profile than Apple did. Nothing wrong with being colorful in your descriptions either, but you're more likely to get colorful responses back. And it was a bit presumptuous to prescribe what the fan speed "should" be if you didn't engineer the MacBook Pro. The CPU isn't about to melt, for example. Previous generations were unable to do this (both due to the silicon designs in them being more power hungry, and the thermal designs being more restrained), so if you hit 100C on an older Mac, you'd be seeing thermal throttling very soon after (as frequency would necessarily need to be reduced to remove heat at an appropriate rate).Ĭlick to expand.Nothing wrong with being cautious, but your comments were a bit sensational and weren't phrased as questions but warnings. ![]() What you will be in danger of (if your cooling solution is not good enough), is thermal throttling - which, as pointed out, doesn't seem to be an issue with these machines, as they can very easily maintain optimal max, non-detrimental temps (of around 100C). ![]() Silicon is not going to melt away at 100C, so whether you're on a Mac or PC, you're not in danger of destroying your CPU. Mostly, you'll see hardcore gamers or tech reviewers spewing that 100C is too much, but what they're really commenting on is that once you get to this point, it's likely that thermal throttling is soon to follow. My point is simply that this has been a contentious subject on these forums, one that industry experts (e.g., have weighed in on with a resounding "no, this isn't an issue - they're meant to run that way."Ī primary issue is that there is a lot of confusion around the topic. ![]() Click to expand.For clarification - I wasn't intending to offend, if it seemed so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |